Determination of who may derive most benefit from aspirin in primary prevention: subgroup results from a randomised controlled trial.

نویسندگان

  • T W Meade
  • P J Brennan
چکیده

OBJECTIVE To determine which groups of patients may derive particular benefit or experience harm from the use of low dose aspirin for the primary prevention of coronary heart disease. DESIGN Randomised controlled trial. SETTING 108 group practices in the Medical Research Council's general practice research framework who were taking part in the thrombosis prevention trial. PARTICIPANTS 5499 men aged between 45 and 69 years at entry who were at increased risk of coronary heart disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Myocardial infarction, coronary death, and stroke. RESULTS Aspirin reduced coronary events by 20%. This benefit, mainly for non-fatal events, was significantly greater the lower the systolic blood pressure at entry (interaction P=0.0015), the relative risk at pressures 130 mm Hg being 0.55 compared with 0.94 at pressures >145 mm Hg. Aspirin also reduced strokes at low but not high pressures, the relative risks being 0.41 and 1.42 (P=0.006) respectively. The relative risk of all major cardiovascular events-that is, the sum of coronary heart disease and stroke-was 0.59 at pressures <130 mm Hg compared with 1.08 at pressures >145 mm Hg (P=0.0001). CONCLUSION Even with the limitations of subgroup analyses the evidence suggests that the benefit of low dose aspirin in primary prevention may occur mainly in those with lower systolic blood pressures, although it is not clear even in these men that the benefit outweighs the potential hazards. Men with higher pressures may be exposed to the risks of bleeding while deriving no benefit through reductions in coronary heart disease and stroke.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Accrual and drop out in a primary prevention randomised controlled trial: qualitative study

BACKGROUND Recruitment and retention of participants are critical to the success of a randomised controlled trial. Gaining the views of potential trial participants who decline to enter a trial and of trial participants who stop the trial treatment is important and can help to improve study processes. Limited research on these issues has been conducted on healthy individuals recruited for preve...

متن کامل

Clinical evidence for the use of aspirin in the treatment of cancer

Although the anti-cancer effects of aspirin were first identified in pre-clinical models four decades ago, a clear role for the drug in either the prevention or treatment of cancer has not been established. Concerns about toxicity, particularly major haemorrhage, and a lack of randomised evidence demonstrating efficacy have limited its use in primary prevention; there was also doubt that a simp...

متن کامل

The CAPRIE-like subgroups of CHARISMA: a CAPRIEciously biased analysis of an unCHARISMAtic truth.

In a textbook example of an improper subgroup analysis (1) (one defined by events subsequent to randomization, in this case fabricating new “CAPRIE [Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischemic Events]-like” inclusion criteria), Bhatt et al. (2) present data suggesting that persons with a prior history of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), or peripheral vascular disease (PVD) may...

متن کامل

Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy on Headache Considering the Moderating Role of Alexithymia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background Mindfulness-based intervention has been found efficacious in reducing primary headaches and negative cognitive-related pain. However, little is known about the potential moderators in this regard. One of the most important moderators affecting the headaches is Alexithymia.  Objective The present study investigated the moderating role of Alexithymia on the effect of Mindfulness-Based...

متن کامل

O-30: Novel Interventions to Reduce ReInfection in Women with Chlamydia: A Randomised-Controlled Trial

Background: To determine if postal testing kits (PTK) and patient delivered partner therapy (PDPT) for managing sexual partners of women with Chlamydia tracho-matis, reduce re-infection rates in women, compared to partner notification by patient referral. Materials and Methods: Three hundred and thirty women testing positive for chlamydia, at clinics for genitourinary medicine, family planning ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • BMJ

دوره 321 7252  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2000